kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

 

Reviews

page 5 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Overall Performance, Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
  • Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks, Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
  • With that said, though lower-resolution game performance with non-optimized titles remains an issue for Ryzen, that situation is improving. A recent patch for Ashes of the Singularity doesn't put Ryzen on the same level as Intel's high-end processors, but...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • After Ryzen 7 the tide has now turned to Ryzen 5, and it has been an interesting time for AMD. The processor launch has been good, but not great. The Ryzen platform is still a little immature. This mainly focuses on memory compatibility and somewhat lower...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake", Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests, Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack), Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation, Unlocked multiplier,
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips, High power draw, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Overclocking barely worth it, Requires optimized apps of which
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X currently retails for $250. Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake" Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack) Single-threaded performance impro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net

  • performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
  • AMD Ryzen 7 produced a revolution in the 8-core area, offering at least the same performance as Intel LGA2011 counterparts, but at half price. Now Ryzen 5 came to compete with LGA1151 solutions, and AMD banged Intel's head again with 1600X, a 6-core/12-th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-22, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • For such a small six-game sample, those benchmarks showed quite a few interesting results. Perhaps the most exciting conclusion we can draw is that upcoming six-core Ryzen processors should perform roughly on par with eight-core models when playing today'...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-05, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Solid Multi-Core performance, 1600X is close to 1700 in performance, Both are suitable for gaming, 1600X is also a good option for content creation, New AM4 platform, wide range of motherboards available, Great Value for money at the current prices, Good
  • Overclocking with the Wraith coolers was limited
  • Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The Ryzen 5 CPUs are pretty much what we expected; slight enhancements in software/microcode with similar multi-core performance that scales with core count and frequency compared to Ryzen 7. At similar price points to Intel's offerings, the multi-threade...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 35 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×