kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066

Testseek.com have collected 79 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066.
Award: Most Awarded December 2017
December 2017
 
(81%)
79 Reviews
Users
(83%)
143 Reviews
81 0 100 79

 

Reviews

page 2 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-02, Author: Bình , review by: topnewreview.com

  • Abstract:  we know for a fact that the best consumer processor money can buy right now is Intel's Core i9-7980XE. Its 18 cores of brutality lay waste to most, if not all, multithreaded tasks you can throw its way. And single-core? Well, it's enough to make most of t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-01-02, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Abstract:  Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • So I think most people will admit that AMD has had a lot of wins this year with all of the Ryzen launches. As I found out in our 1700v7700K coverage the 7700K was still a great performing CPU, especially when looking at gaming performance. But with ju...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-30, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • In the 2000s, we had the frequency wars. Trying to pump all the MHz into a single core ended up mega-hurting one company in particular, until the push was made to multi-core and efficient systems. Now in the 2010s, we have the Core Wars. You need to have...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-28, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • It's time once again to condense all of our test results into our famous value scatter plots. We use a geometric mean of all of our real-world results to ensure that no one test has an undue impact on the overall index. First up, let's look at gaming per...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-27, Author: Bob , review by: thinkcomputers.org

  • 16 cores, 32-threads, Incredible multi-threaded performance, Good temperatures at default speeds, 35% performance increase over the i9-7900X
  • You'll need a good motherboard for overclocking, Quite expensive
  • As I said in my review of the Core i9-7980XE we are living in a very exciting time for CPUs. This processor is packing in 16-cores, 32-threads and it is not even at the top of the product stack! At its default clock speeds it is a work horse! It is going...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Turbo Boost frequencies improve singlethreaded performance, Leading IPC throughput, Multithreaded performance
  • Poor thermal dissipation, Requires water cooling, Power consumption, Price
  • The Core i9-7960X offers the best performance from a 16-core processor in both lightly-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Expect to pay for the privilege of owning one, though. Moreover, thermal challenges dictate that expensive add-ons like custo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Mark , review by: arstechnica.com

  • The fastest slice of silicon going, Good gaming performance, Improved memory support, Modern complement of I/O
  • Not that much faster than Threadripper 1950X, Fewer PCIe lanes than the competition, Power hungry, Continual use of TIM instead of solder, High clock speeds and quiet systems out of the question without custom liquid cooling or delidding
  • That Intel finds itself in a place where its flagship processors just barely scrape past the competition is an astonishing turn of events. It might well continue to offer the best gaming performance in the mainstream, where gaming continues to be the key...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • The results basically speak for themselves. If you would like to compare your own system(s) Linux performance against the results found in this article, simply install the Phoronix Test Suite and run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709241-TY-INTELCORE86...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Jarred , review by: pcgamer.com

  • Nearly as fast as the i9
  • Diminishing returns as price increases, Overclocking needs a serious PSU and HSF, The i78700K is a far more sensible gaming CPU
  • The i9-7960X is extremely potent, but the price and power are tough pills to swallow...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 2 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×