kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Mp3/media-player » Apple iPod Nano 3G 4GB / 8GB



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple iPod Nano 3G 4GB / 8GB

Testseek.com have collected 86 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 3G 4GB / 8GB and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 3G 4GB / 8GB.
Award: Good Buy January 2008
January 2008
 
(84%)
86 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 86

 

Reviews

page 5 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Adds video playback, Cover Flow searching, superb battery life.
  • Chunky design, bottom-mounted headphone socket, no supplied video conversion software.
  • The previous Nano generations were nice players, but it was hard to make the case for buying them when the hard disk-based iPods (now sold as the iPod Classic) were a similar price for much more storage. Adding video and the very enticing carrot of vas...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2007-12-01, review by: stuff.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Youve got to give Apple credit. They usually dont get there first, but they do a hell of a job once they do. Other companies have been releasing iPod nano-sized and nano-priced MP3 players that also play video for about 18 months, a feature that was ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-03-07, review by: techradar.com

  • Amazing screen resolution, Small and light, New menus and Cover Flow
  • Screen is small, Stubby design, 8GB maximum memory
  • Stubby. That was the first word that popped into our heads when we clapped eyes on the new iPod nano. Three seconds later, though, with the device lying seductively in our hands, we turned from sceptic to believer. Its nearly impossible not to be full...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2007-12-17, Author: Dan , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • All the features of the iPod classic – including video playback, video output, and games – in a smaller, less-expensive, and flash-memory-based player; Bright, clear screen; very good sound quality, excellent battery life, improved user interf...
  • Incompatible with some existing dock-connector accessories, shiny back surface not as rugged as anodised metal of previous version, can’t use previously-purchased games, Cover Flow performance limited, new visuals-heavy interface slowed by album art...
  • The iPod touch complicates the ‘Which iPod should I buy?’ question. But when it comes to traditional iPods, the decision has never been easier. For those without huge iTunes libraries – or people who don’t mind managing which part...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Worthy successors to the iPod name. Sleek looks and intuitive menus at a fair price. The legendary white iPod is no more. In its place is a slimmer brushed aluminium model, in silver or black, known as the iPod classic. Unlike Coke Classic, its even...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-18, review by: alphr.com

  • Abstract:  Both players have their strong points, but the best feature remains the simple interface and excellent design. The iPod touch might be the one grabbing headlines, but Apple has given the entire iPod range a thorough shake-up. Theres no longer any suc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-05, Author: Andy , review by: pocketgamer.co.uk

  • Abstract:  After an Apple mole leaked a picture of the somewhat chubby new iPod nano on the intertubes before the computer companys illustrious leader could make its birth announcement, some were in two minds about the upcoming device. After all, it represented ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  The latest version of the iPod Nano looks very different to its predecessor. The long, lean shape has been replaced by a shorter, wider design that houses a 2in screen with a 320x240 resolution for video playback. The looks may take some getting use...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-27, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Small size, Design and ergonomics, Display quality, Autonomy
  • Can only be synchronized with a single computer, No drag and drop to transfer files, Battery cannot by removed, Fastidious video conversion

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-17, review by: stuff.tv

  • Excellent sound, video, interface. Flawless iTunes integration. Build quality ...
  • Divisive styling...
  • The best MP3 player in the world: tiny, attractive and extremely talented ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
    page 5 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×