kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi

Testseek.com have collected 93 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi.
Award: Most Awarded January 2008
January 2008
 
(84%)
93 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 93

 

Reviews

page 7 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-11-06, review by: T3.com

  • High resolution, Great quality images
  • Anti-dust system not 100% effective, Anti-shake lenses cost more
  • This improves on the superb 350D, but its up against some tough new rivals.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-10-27, review by: itreviews.com

  • Abstract:  superb pro-sumer digital SLR camera: An evolution of Canons 300D and 350D digital SLRs, the EOS 400D is a digital SLR camera aimed at what you might call pro-sumers. Professionals might occasionally be found with these and your average photography enthusi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2006-09-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Canons EOS 400D is the successor to the hugely popular EOS 350D digital SLR, featuring 10.1 megapixel resolution, anti-dust features and a bigger, 2.5in, screen.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-09-26, review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Compact and lightweight; fast and responsive; intelligently designed with shooting-friendly layout.
  • Second status LCD has been eliminated; slow kit lens; no spot metering; poor exposure of backlit subjects.
  • The Canon EOS 400D remains a very good first dSLR, but ultimately a disappointing followup to the 350D, which cedes its lead to the Nikon D80.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(78%)
 
  Published: 2007-03-06, review by: thestar.com.my

  • Dust reduction system; nine-point autofocus; improved interface.
  • Noise levels a little higher than the 350D; handgrip too small.
  • So is the 400D worth paying extra for? Well certainly not if you compare resolution alone – theres really not a significant enough difference between the 8-megapixel 350D and the 10-megapixels of the 400D to make it worth the money.However, where th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-01-16, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Abstract:  10-megapixel cameras seem to be the rage these days and we are not just strictly referring to the professional range. Be it in the realm of digital SLRs or compacts, there are enough signs to tell you that the 10-megapixel camera race is o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: letsgodigital.org/es/

  • Abstract:  En solo tres años, Canon se las ha arreglado para lanzar la tercera cámara réflex de introducción. Cada cámara parece llegar con pequeñas, aunque importantes mejoras. La significación de los desarrollos actuales resulta claramente aparente cuando colo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-08, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Bonne gestion du bruit numérique, Appareil très réactif (mise en route, autofocus), Bonne qualité des images / Système antipoussière, Boîtier simple à prendre en main / Fonction Styles d’image intéressant...
  • Une seule molette de réglage, Viseur étroit, mais lumineux, Balance des blancs capricieuse en intérieur, Pas de stabilisation optique, Optique 1855 mm « limite » pour un capteur à 10 millions de pixels
  • Rapide, simple d’utilisation et délivrant des images de qualité pour le public visé, le 400D séduira à la fois les canonistes et les photographes débutants....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: Cnetfrance.fr

  • Une excellente gestion du bruit ; une vélocité remarquable ; un large écran ; une bonne ergonomie.
  • Un système anti-poussière perfectible ; un processeur d’image d’ancienne génération ; pas de mesure spot ; la molette centrale fait toujours défaut.
  • Une nouvelle mouture sans réelle surprise mais non sans qualités, tant sur le plan technique qu’ergonomique. A moins de 800 €, l’EOS 400D devrait rencontrer un succès au moins équivalent à celui d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: zdnet.fr

  • Une excellente gestion du bruit ; une vélocité remarquable ; un large écran ; une bonne ergonomie.
  • Un système anti-poussière perfectible ; un processeur d’image d’ancienne génération ; pas de mesure spot ; la molette centrale fait toujours défaut.
  • Une nouvelle mouture sans réelle surprise mais non sans qualités, tant sur le plan technique qu’ergonomique. A moins de 800 €, l’EOS 400D devrait rencontrer un succès au moins équivalent à celui de son prédécesseur. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
    page 7 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×