kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 3

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(90%)
212 Reviews
Users
(96%)
759 Reviews
90 0 100 212

 

Reviews

page 7 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-05-04, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Improved AF performance. Excellent image quality. Headphone monitoring. Improved video quality with low moire and artefacts. Excellent high ISO performance
  • Repositioned buttons may annoy Mark II upgraders. No clean HDMI output. Video and images straight from camera can benefit from a small amount of sharpening
  • Packed full of improvements for photographers, Canon has proved that you can improve on an already-strong formula with the 5D Mark III....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(87%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-13, review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Because the Mark II still has plenty to offer to both serious enthusiasts and professional photographers, it will remain on sale, at a reduced price of AUD$2799 for the body or AUD$3899 for the Premium kit with the 24-105mm lens, as we reviewed. As such, ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(99%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-06, Author: Angela , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Excellent HDR mode, Detailed raw and JPG files, High quality images, Low noise
  • Complicated AF system, A bit pricey
  • Buying Guide Best DSLR: top cameras by price and brand While the key specification changes since the 5D Mark II largely just bring the Canon EOS 5D Mark III into line with Canon's existing DSLRs, we're impressed with the results from the new camera. Raw a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-01, review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Build and Ergonomics Canon says the new camera represents a complete redesign but, physically, there's not a huge difference between the EOS 5D Mark III and EOS 5D Mark II, although the Mark III is slightly larger and heavier. The table below compares key...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-25, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • The 5D Mark III is an improvement on the Mark II in almost every way.While not a radical overhaul or a dramatic leap in technology, the Mark III shores up most of the gaps in the Mark II's performance profile, offering the benefit of faster shot-to-shot t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(98%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-25, Author: paul_smart , review by: gadgetspeak.com

  • Abstract:  While I am always as guilty as most to not reading the %^&*(“! manual not so here as this unit stretches me as I would call it a semi-professional model and that is almost beyond me, but I do enjoy the challenge.The new lens sent with the unit is rather n...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(76%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-27, Author: Angela , review by: techradar.com

  • Excellent HDR mode, Detailed raw and JPG files, High quality images, Low noise
  • Complicated AF system, A bit pricey
  • While it may not have excited the photographic world in the same way that the Nikon D800 seems to have, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is a very capable camera. It suffers a little from the fact that the majority of the systems have been seen elsewhere in the...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-20, review by: howtospendit.ft.com

  • Abstract:  I'm often asked the not unreasonable question, “So which is the best camera?” to which my answer recently has been one stolen from professional photographic lore: “The best camera is the one you have with you when a great picture presents itself.” I was ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-24, Author: Gavin , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Setting a new benchmark for amateur and independent film makers, affordable alternative to pro broadcast cameras, rock solid workhorse-like build
  • Pricey if you don’t require broadcast quality video, slight delay whilst mirror mechanism flips out of the way before video recording can commence, clip duration limited to just under 30 minutes as it’s a camera not a camcorder
  • Capturing video at 1920x1080 pixels and 29.97 frames per second, admittedly shooting with a DSLR isn't quite as smooth or straightforward from the get go as on a regular camcorder or even compact system camera. This is because recording begins after the i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-29, Author: Ben , review by: alphr.com

  • Breathtaking image quality and a wide range of autofocus options are among the highlights of this superbly rounded package...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
    page 7 of 22 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×