kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS / IXUS 105 IS



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS / IXUS 105 IS

Testseek.com have collected 36 expert reviews of the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS / IXUS 105 IS and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS / IXUS 105 IS.
Award: Recommended November 2010
November 2010
 
(74%)
36 Reviews
Users
(82%)
89 Reviews
74 0 100 36

 

Reviews

page 3 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-03-03, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Great design, finish and build quality; useful 4x wide-angle zoom range; straightforward controls
  • Underwhelming specifications; high price; average picture quality
  • The Canon IXUS 105 is smart and rather desirable, but its beauty is really only skin-deep. At heart, it's a rather ordinary camera with a useful but unexceptional 4x zoom. Whereas other manufacturers are keen to push back the frontiers of technology, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(68%)
 
  Published: 2010-02-25, review by: techradar.com

  • Beautiful design, Great stills quality, Well made
  • Slow continuous mode, No HD video, Pricey
  • The humble Ixus 95 has been propping up Canon's stylish range of lifestyle cameras for around a year, so it's surprising to see it being be put out to pasture.But technology's march is relentless, so the 95 shuffles off into retirement and the...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-25, review by: firstpost.com

  • Good reproduction of colors, Good ISO values till 800, Wide angle lens, Excellent fit and finish
  • No HD recording, Limited set of features
  • The video mode was a bit of a letdown since it doesn’t support HD recording but comes with a maximum recording resolution of 640 x 480 and the lowest resolution being 320 x 240. However the camera does well in producing a well balanced video output. It...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-03, Author: Joshua , review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Good styling; easy to operate; very good photo quality.
  • Basic feature set for its price.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2010-08-25, review by: tbreak.ae

  • Abstract:  Whether it is worth the extra AED 100 depends on your average usage and desired results. At the end of the day, both the IXUS 105 and PowerShot A3100 IS are very capable offerings by Canon for the point and shoot market.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-05, Author: Arturo , review by: parentesis.com

  • Diseño bonito, es sencilla de usar y tiene buena calidad de foto, además de que el autofoco tiene buen rendimiento
  • Hay un poco de sobreexposición en los modos automáticos y algo de ruido en la grabación de video
  • Es ideal para quienes buscan una cámara sencilla que haga prácticamente todo con sólo oprimir el botón disparador. Tiene buena calidad de imagen, aunque si buscas un equipo que te permita manipular los valores de imagen y grabe con alta calidad el vide...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-08-31, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Appareil compact et esthétiquement réussi, Bonne qualité globale des images, Interface graphique agréable et facile à comprendre, Autotofocus globalement correct, Automatismes performants
  • Pas de vidéo HDTV 720, Objectif un peu mou et peu lumineux en télé, Toujours pas d'histogramme à la prise de vue, Mode rafale très limité
  • L'Ixus 105 est, au final, un sympathique appareil de poche. Facile à prendre en mains, il délivre des images correctes dans les situations les plus courantes. Il sera toutefois pénalisé en basse lumière par un écran médiocre et un télé peu lumineux. L'...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-18, review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Zum Sommer stellt eine neue Kamera ein schönes Geschenk dar: Urlaubserinnerungen machen graue Regentage in der nächsten kalten Jahreszeit etwas erträglicher. COMPUTER BILD gibt Kamera-Empfehlungen für Outdoor-Freunde, Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-10-27, review by: Chip.de

  • Weitwinkel, Bildstabilisator, Intelligente Automatik, Günstig
  • Schärfe in Bildecken, Sichtbarer Texturverlust
  • Canon bietet mit der schmucken, handlichen Ixus 105 eine gelungene Kamera im günstigen Preissegment. Die Ausstattung und die Bildqualität gehen für den Preis absolut in Ordnung und die einfache Bedienung wird viele Einsteiger ansprechen. Für Schnappschüss...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(68%)
 
  Published: 2010-08-24, review by: betabuzz.de

  • sehr günstig, tolle Bildqualität, gutes Bedienkonzept, kompakt, gut verarbeitet
  • sehr langsam, geringe Ausstattung, zu wenig manuelle Einstellungsmöglichkeiten, überarbeitungswürdiges Display
  • Die Canon IXUS 105 ist eine sehr günstige Digitalkamera zu einem fairen Preis. Die wichtigsten Faktoren stimmen: Design und Verarbeitung wirken nicht billig und die Bildqualität liegt sogar über den Erwartungen. Dafür hat Canon bei der softwareseitige...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 3 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×