kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D300s



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D300s

Testseek.com have collected 84 expert reviews of the Nikon D300s and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D300s.
Award: Highest Rated September 2009
September 2009
 
(85%)
84 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 84

 

Reviews

page 3 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-09-09, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • Outstanding performance for its class; excellent photo quality; solidly built; flexible custom settings architecture; video capture; onboard wireless flash controller; dual card slots.
  • Some annoying design and interface quirks; no significant improvements in high ISO noise performance.
  • The Nikon D300s is a great camera, especially if you need the burst speed or slightly improved low-light focus, but if you dont care about video you might consider looking for a really good deal on a D300 and using what you save to splurge on a good l...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-01, review by: cameralabs.com

  • Tough build and superb ergonomics, Quick 51-point AF and burst shooting, 3in VGA screen with Live View, 720p HD movies with microphone input.
  • 12 Mpixels looking low next to EOS 7D, No 1080p video or live histogram, PC control software not bundled, Continuous shooting same as D300 in our tests.
  • With the D300s, Nikon’s taken the already highly capable D300 and further enhanced it with a number of features – some expected, others less so. The inclusion of a movie mode was a predictable, although welcome upgrade, and the microphone inpu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-08-20, review by: electronicsme.com

  • Keeping technology advancements under wraps is hard enough with the speed information travels today, so Nikon have really managed to surprise the industry when introducing the D300s as a result. Keeping their ergonomic design of previous models and pac...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2009-08-18, review by: pricemo.com

  • It’s very fast to operate and offers the fastest continuousshooting mode this side of £3,000. It’s the perfect stepping stone between an amateur and professional DSLR. It’s more expensive than the Canon 50D, but it’s also fast...
  • In terms of absolute image quality the D300S doesn’t offer much improvement over older models such as the Nikon D200 or D300. Its noise performance is good, but not as good as fullframe cameras such as the D700 or Canon 5D MK II. But it will probabl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-07-30, review by: infosyncworld.com


 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-07-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Abstract:  I’d like to start this press release with a spot of controversy!Following the release yesterday of the new Nikon D300s dSLR camera and a couple of lenses (you can download Nikon’s podcast on the releases here) I was chatting on twitter last night to a...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  Nikon's D300s is the very same camera we loved two years ago, but with a few new tricks to try to stay relevant in this crazy video-shootin' DSLR world we live in. Namely, 720p video. Same Ol' Same Ol' The D300s remains a capable, even imp...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Depending on how you rate the addition of video capture and dual card slots, Nikon's D300S can be rated as either a major or minor upgrade to the D300. Aside from these features, little has changed from the earlier model. The sensor is the same DX-form...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-22, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Incredible burst speed , Bright, easy-to-use viewfinder , Dual-card slots , Excellent image quality
  • Not that much in the way of improvements over the D300 , Heavy with 18-200mm kit lens
  • The D300s is a fast, reliable workhorse for the semi-professional or amateur photographer, and it feels great to use and makes picture taking a real pleasure. But if you don't need HD video, you might want to try the plain old D300 instead....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: amateurphotographer.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Nikon D300s at a glance: 12.3 million effective pixels 720p HD video recording ISO 100-6400 (equivalent) 3in, 920,000 dot LCD screen RRP £1,499.99 (body only)Scores: Features - 9/10 Build and handling - 9/10 AWB/colour - 9/10 Metering - 9/10 Autofocus...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×