kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Pentax K-5



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Pentax K-5

Testseek.com have collected 74 expert reviews of the Pentax K-5 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Pentax K-5.
Award: Editor’s Choice December 2010
December 2010
 
(85%)
74 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 74

 

Reviews

page 2 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-11-22, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The Pentax K-5 combines the proven design of the K-7 with an exciting new 16.3 megapixel APS-C sensor to create an appealingly well-specified, intuitive and customisable DSLR with few real drawbacks. Virtually identical to the K-7, Pentax haven't take...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-11-18, review by: Neocamera.com

  • The Pentax K-5 shows exceptional image quality while improving upon the previously unmatched feature-set of its predecessor. Its wealth of features, many of them uncommon, helps users take better pictures. The combination of automatic horizon correcti...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-01, review by: toptenreviews.com

  • This device can capture full HD video at 25 frames per second,
  • The electronic leveler can only be used in Live View mode.
  • The wide ISO range and anti-shake technology produce high-quality images and video on the Pentax K-5....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: dpreview.com

  • Good detail and dynamic range (even better in RAW), Exceptionally low shadow noise in RAW files at low ISOs, One of the best APS-C DSLRs in terms of high ISO image quality, Very good build quality and handling, Maximum ISO of 51,200 at full resolution, 1080p HD video mode with basic editing built-in, Useful electronic level and composition adjustment functions, Comprehensive customization optio
  • AF system not as versatile as Nikon D7000 (which is a cheaper camera), Lockable exposure mode dial can be annoying, No dedicated movie shooting button, No AF during movie shooting, Poorly implemented live histogram in live view/manual exposure mode (doesn't show final exposure), No 'live' aperture control during movie shooting, Shadow Correction mode doesn't take full advantage of K-5's sensor,
  • We liked the Pentax K-7 a lot, and our only significant criticism was its relatively poor high ISO performance. The K-5 brings all the things that we liked about the K-7 - the compact, solid body, and generally well thought-out ergonomics, and excelle...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-26, review by: avhub.com.au

  • Abstract:  If you thought the Pentax K-7 was packed with features then meet the K-5 which has even more goodies plus, just for good measure, a higher resolution sensor with significantly increased sensitivity. Report by Paul Burrows.Pentax has been the only D-SLR ma...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-01, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Good design and build quality, Good autosystem, Good image quality
  • Some improvements needed in design, K7 is £300 cheaper

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-01, review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Like the K-7, the K-5 uses SD and SDHC memory cards but also accepts the latest SDXC media. It is compatible with all K-7 accessories, including the D-BG4 battery grip, external flash guns (including a ring flash), viewfinder magnifiers, four interchangea...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-26, review by: smh.com.au

  • Abstract:  Pentax calls this 16-megapixel camera its professional APS-C model. The chunky, rugged body feels tough and incorporates features such as a 100 per cent viewfinder, high-resolution LCD, fast seven frames-per-second burst mode, DNG and PEF RAW format...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-26, review by: brisbanetimes.com.au

  • Get the Morning EditionSign up for our daily wrap of the news you need to start your day.Email addressBy signing up you accept our privacy policy and conditions of use...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-20, Author: terry , review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • Like: Image quality is on a par with the competition from Canon and Nikon. Autofocus in Liveview is astonishingly fast and accurate.
  • Dislike: Auto white balance is disappointing. The camera doesn't get anywhere near adjusting for tungsten light. It is best to shoot RAW for ease of colour correction in post camera processing

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×