kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 277 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Most Awarded April 2017
April 2017
 
(80%)
277 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 277

 

Reviews

page 9 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-05-02, Author: Chief , review by: lowyat.net

  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X is a more down to earth product as compared to its higher-end siblings that we have tested before. Rather than edging out its designated competitor Intel Core i5-7500, the CPU generally stands on par with it. It might not sound much...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-29, Author: Leo , review by: techporn.ph

  • SummaryThe AMD Ryzen 5 1500X continues the AM4 platform's win streak for just about $189 or about 9800 Pesos. A great choice for those looking for a capable 4-core 8-thread CPU...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(78%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-21, Author: Chester , review by: hardwarezone.com.ph

  • 4-cores, 8-threads, Comes with a Wraith Stealth cooler, Can reach 3.9GHz easily
  • Overclocking is hit or miss, Lower performance compared to Intel's 4-core, 8-thread part
  • What more can we say with AMD's Ryzen processors? They offer great price-to-performance ratio and impressive thermals. Overclocking Ryzen CPUs can be a bit finicky as you might be unlucky in the silicon lottery, but they perform well under their stock set...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-29, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • In a nutshell, Ryzen 5's main advantage over Intel's Core i5 range is the higher number of cores and threads it offers while sharing the same price bracket. That's not unlike what AMD offers with its Ryzen 7 CPUs, all of which are 8-core/16-thread parts...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-10, review by: tbreak.ae

  • More affordable than Intel i56500, Great performance for the price, 65W TDP, Unlocked for OC
  • Gaming performance can be improved beyond Intel's best equivalents
  • Along with the release of the octa-core Ryzen chips, AMD also came up with the quad-core Ryzen 5 1500X for those who just want to game. But is it a good substitute for Intel's top quad-core CPUs? That's what we'll test today. Architecture and Specifica...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2018-03-14, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  全新八代APU已经上市有一段时间了,相信大家对已经上市的两款产品有所了解。在之前的对比评测当中,本站编辑将其中锐龙R5-2400G和酷睿i5-8400进行评测对比,结果是前者性价比简直吊打后者。昨天本站已经为大家带来了R5-2400G对比R5-1400评测一文,今天脚本之家再次为大家带来了有关R5-2400G对比R5-1500X评测,看看通过对比揭晓R5 2400G和R5 1500X哪个好这一问题的答案。R5 2400G和R5 1500X哪个好 R5-2400G对比R5-1500X评测一、基本规格...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-24, Author: 3小时前 , review by: itheat.com

  • 结合今天的测试,AMD锐龙5 1500X与全新八代酷睿i5-8400都取得了令玩家们满意的成绩,但是回归到我们评测的初衷,本次评测是在针对主流处理器,通过最普遍的测试项目,力图为大家提供更加具有选择意义的数据。我们发现尽管i5-8400性能很好,但是游戏性方面对于AMD锐龙5 1500X综合对比来说还有一定的差距,但考虑到i5-8400先期的搭配主板高昂售价(因为八代酷睿目前能搭配的主板只有Z370),而锐龙这边的主板可选择性就十分多元化了,更加符合吃鸡玩家的利益。以上说了这么多,就是给用户们多一个选择。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-11, Author: 赵鑫喆 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • Abstract:  《绝地求生:大逃杀》在经历了长达半年多的“公测”之后,该游戏的1.0正式版终于在去年年末正式上线,同时《绝地求生》的国服代理权也已确认有腾讯获得。再此前,腾讯公布了《绝地求生》1.0正式版的推荐 CPU ,从推荐来看, AMD Ryzen 5 1500X即可完美达到这款游戏对于CPU的性能要求,而 Intel 平台则需要搭配酷睿 i5 7600K。熟悉CPU的朋友们都知道,Ryzen 5 1500X的价格比i5-7600K低了500元,而在价格相同的前提下,Ryzen 5 1500X的对手应该是酷睿i5...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-17, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • Abstract:  在CPU中,AMD 锐龙 Ryzen5 1500X与Intel酷睿i5-8400价位差不多的情况下,购买哪一款比较好呢?而外媒做了一个实测,边直播边测试游戏的方式测试两个CPU的性能,下面装机之家分享一下i5-8400对比Ryzen5 1500X性能实测评测,来看看吧。测试使用的H.264编码器有超快,非常快,更快,快,中等,最慢这几个编码模式。大多数测试使用的是“更快”的预设。他们以1080p分辨率60帧的设定在YouTube进行直播输出测试。而没有测试720P的原因是降至720p60帧会显著降低CPU...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-03, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Intel:Intel的目前来说总体性能会低于AMD的同级别的产品,能耗比i5-7500表现尚可,但是7700K的能耗比表现比较感人。主要的优势是单线程性能和包含集显。AMD:近十年来AMD几乎是第一次达到比较普遍的性能压制Intel,同时能耗比控制也做的较好,1700是较为突出的代表,不过受制于目前的显卡市场,不带集显的规格存在一定的硬伤。总体来说目前AMD CPU产品终于是回到了正常的竞争水平,产品上也表现出较好的竞争力。Intel这边目前还是较为混乱(X299实在不敢恭维),相信在8系列酷睿上线之后...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 9 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×