kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2.
 
(85%)
212 Reviews
Users
(92%)
644 Reviews
85 0 100 212

 

Reviews

page 6 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Decent CPU performance, Some light gaming possible, Interesting chip for media PCs
  • Socket restrictions, Gaming performance is ultimately mediocre

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Before we dive further into the challenges facing AMD’s Fusion strategy, let’s take a closer look at what the A10-5800K was able to achieve, and where it fell flat. In terms of raw central processing tasks Trinity is a mixed bag. Its Piledriver CPU cor...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-02, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Abstract:  If

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-01, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Our series of gaming performance articles where we take one CPU and put it up against another one and run a series of game benchmarks, is very well known meanwhile...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-30, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In the past few months we tested and compared quite a few Intel CPUs regarding gaming performance. Therefore it's about time that we have a closer look at some AMD CPUs. Today we're going to check out AMDs A10-6800K and put it up against its predecessor t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-18, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  With Haswell's IGP Intel had set itself ambitious goals. One for example is that they want to heat up the competition with AMD when it comes to integrated grahics performance. Wether Intel is going to succeed or not and how Intel's HD 4600 as well as AMD'...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-15, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Faster memory = faster integrated graphics performance? When we test RAM modules we tend to say that the speed of the RAM has no significant impact on the performance of Intel systems. Intel's smart cache and memory controller make it so the CPU almost a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-08, Author: James , review by: micromart.co.uk

  • Abstract:  It might be AMD's best APU, with an integrated Radeon HD 7660D GPU that utterly trounces even the Intel HD Graphics 4000 found in the company's top Ivy Bridge CPUs, but the AMD A10 5800K has one major flaw: it's a gaming chip that's no good for gaming.AMD...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 6 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×