kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace

Testseek.com have collected 158 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace.
 
(71%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 158

 

Reviews

page 3 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-06-16, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Galaxy Ace is a mid-range Android smartphone that offers a slick user experience, but it's overpriced compared to its rivals. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-30, review by: stuff.tv

  • Abstract:  For a mid-ranger, the Ace's feature set looks solid enough – 5MP snapper, Android 2.2, 800MHz processor – but when you consider the phone has been spotted going for free on a £10.50 a month, two year contract, the handset starts to look like a world beate...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-27, Author: Edward , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Surprisingly fast interface, Stylish design, Easy to type on
  • Low resolution screen, No flash support in browser, Only runs Android 2.2
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace isn't as spectacular as its name suggests but it is a competent budget smartphone. As ever, the Orange San Francisco makes for a compelling alternative thanks to its larger, higher resolution screen, but the Ace has a nicer desig...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-21, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • A smart design, colourful screen and decent camera make the Ace an attractive phone, but it has limited room for apps and lacks the Motorola Defy's large screen ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-20, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Great looking design, generous screen size, external speaker performance
  • Limited multimedia performance, low resolution video capture is behind the times
  • Ultimately, if multimedia isn’t important to you, then the Samsung Galaxy Ace offers the flexibility of Android effectively and in a clear and hassle-free package. But the Galaxy Ace doesn’t really offer up anything truly distinctive outside its good l...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-12, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Usability and handling, Clear, intuitive interface, Reasonable finish, even if it is all plastic, Generally responsive, Battery life
  • Poor quality video recorder, Screen doesn't have much contrast and narrow viewing angles, Get rid of the handsfree kit, Not much support for music and video formats
  • The Galaxy Ace is a nice little smartphone for anybody who wants to give Android a go without breaking the bank. Apart from the camera, which did better than we'd expected, it's rather limited in multimedia features. But overall, this is a fast, handy ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-06, review by: recombu.com

  • The Galaxy Ace is a great mid-range smartphone, and is one of the best-looking mid-priced smartphones we’ve seen. It has all the features you’d expect from an Android phone, although it lacks the very latest version, Android Gingerbread, and the faster...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-06, review by: fonehome.co.uk

  • While the HTC Wildfire S is the more attractive mid-range phone, the Galaxy Ace does at least offer a superior screen and slightly speedier performance – factors every bit as crucial as an aluminium unibody chassis....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-21, review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Good looks, excellent price, good features
  • Processor can’t compete with many other smartphones
  • Pros: Good looks, excellent price, good featuresCons: Processor can't compete with many other smartphones Verdict: The Galaxy Ace offers good looks and a decent price, but build quality is only average and the screen is a bit disappointing. Nor can the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-15, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Cheap; small and stylish; plenty of Android features; long battery life
  • No Flash player; iPhone-like appearance will put some people off; no over-the-air Android updates
  • Samsung's made the right sacrifices to keep the cost of the Galaxy Ace down. It has a relatively low-res screen and lacks the power to play Flash video, but this Android phone is packed with fun features and looks much more expensive than it is....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 3 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×