kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Vehicle » Cars » Sedan » Volvo S60 Sedan 2016



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Volvo S60 Sedan 2016

Testseek.com have collected 4 expert reviews of the Volvo S60 Sedan 2016 and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Volvo S60 Sedan 2016.
 
(78%)
4 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
78 0 100 4

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-01-16, review by: motortrend.com

  • Great performance and handling, Impressive fuel economy in front-drive models, The limited-edition Polestar variant is a rarity,
  • The new four-cylinder engines don't sound that good, Interior space is on the small side, Polestar models have more road noise than most Volvos
  • Despite its age, the 2016 S60 remains a great choice for those who don't use their rear seats too much. In a 2015 S60 T6 Drive-E First Test review, we said that the new super- and turbocharged I-4 provides plenty of power and a sizable fuel economy improv...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-04, Author: D.Colman , review by: carreview.com

  • Beautifully Crafted, Ultra Comfortable Interior,
  • Unwieldy Suspension, Poorly Indexed Owner's Manual

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-12-05, Author: Emme , review by: cnet.com

  • The 2016 Volvo S60 T5 Inscription adds more room for rear seat passengers, while a set of driver assistance features, such as adaptive cruise control, takes some of the stress out of parking and traffic
  • The infotainment system is difficult to navigate and often demands that you take your eyes off the road. Bland exterior styling will not appeal to those who want a character-driven car
  • The cushy ride and adaptive cruise control make the Volvo S60 T5 best for those that have long commutes in heavy traffic...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2015-08-14, review by: edmunds.com

  • Muscular and fuel-efficient turbocharged engines, Well-balanced ride and handling, Excellent safety scores
  • Fuel efficiency drops on all-wheel-drive models, Standard wheelbase has less rear legroom than competitors

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×