kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Camcorders » Sony DCR-HC36



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sony DCR-HC36

Testseek.com have collected 8 expert reviews of the Sony DCR-HC36 and the average rating is 63%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony DCR-HC36.
 
(63%)
8 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
63 0 100 8

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-02-09, review by: easycamcorders.com

  • Easy to use Small, compact design Good automatic features
  • Poor video quality Limited manual controls Feels cheap
  • In a world of rapidly burgeoning technology, the Sony DCR-HC36 ($400 MSRP) opts for the safe route. The HC36 and Sony’s entry-level HC26 share numerous core elements such as a standard 1/6” CCD chip, touch screen menu, limited manual controls...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-08-23, review by: macworld.com

  • Low cost; small size; light and easy to carry; easy to use.
  • Comparatively mediocre video quality; awful still-image quality.
  • The Sony DCR-HC36 MiniDV Handycam is a budget camcorder that takes adequate video in daylight, but its poor performance in low light will be a problem if you want to shoot videos indoors—at a party, for instance.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2006-07-26, Author: Philip , review by: cnet.com

  • Very compact size; lightweight; easy to use; low price.
  • Mediocre video quality; short battery life; no accessory shoe; low-quality stills.
  • Unless this camcorders low-resolution, low-quality stills are important to you, you might as well go for Sonys less expensive DCR-HC26.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2006-06-09, review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Abstract:  Sony DCR-HC36 MiniDV Handycam This low-cost MiniDV camcorder is easy to use, but video taken in low light is of below-average quality. At $400 (as of 5/2/06), the Sony DCR-HC36 is very affordable. But, unfortunately, it produced some of the lowest-qual...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2006-05-05, review by: camcorderinfo.com

  • Abstract:  but it?s fun to play with.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2006-07-27, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Very compact size, Lightweight, Easy to use, Low price
  • Mediocre video quality, Short battery life, No accessory shoe, Low-quality stills
  • Unless this camcorders low-resolution, low-quality stills are important to you, you might as well go for Sonys less expensive DCR-HC26. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2006-08-09, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Very compact size; lightweight; easy to use; low price
  • Mediocre video quality; short battery life; no accessory shoe; low-quality stills
  • Unless this camcorders low-resolution, low-quality stills are important to you, you might as well go for Sonys less expensive DCR-HC26 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2006-08-14, review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Very compact size; lightweight; easy to use; low price.
  • Mediocre video quality; short battery life; no accessory shoe; low-quality stills.
  • Unless this camcorders low-resolution, low-quality stills are important to you, you might as well go for Sonys less expensive DCR-HC26.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×