kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon Coolpix 8700



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon Coolpix 8700

Testseek.com have collected 15 expert reviews of the Nikon Coolpix 8700 and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon Coolpix 8700.
 
(74%)
15 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
74 0 100 15

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: letsgodigital.org

  • Abstract:  Coming back to the Coolpix 8700 I see a digital camera with an excellent color reproduction at which the white balance functions far above average: extremely well! The exposure likewise. The automatic exposure hardly gets it wrong, hardly any failures ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2004-05-10, review by: cnet.com

  • Abstract:  <b>Spec:</b> Digital camera, 8,000,000 pixels, LCD display - TFT active matrix - 1.8 in - Color<br> <b>Good:</b> Excellent, highly detailed images; impressive 8X ED-Nikkor zoom lens; sturdy magnesium-alloy body; RAW-file capture.<br> <b>Bad:</b> Easy to accidentally activate some controls; long RAW shot-to-shot time; slow low-light AF; no live histogram in manual mode; 30-second limit on video clips; full RAW-file editing software costs $99 extra.<br> <b>Bottomline:</b> It shoots good photos, but mediocre performance and a serious design flaw may keep this 8-megapixel camera out of the hands of enthusiasts.<br>

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2004-04-20, review by: dpreview.com

  • Eight times optical zoom, nearly 300 mm telephoto reach, Excellent automatic white balance, best of group, Excellent macro performance, best of group, Good image quality, resolution not as high as expected, Smallest and lightest eight megapixel prosumer...
  • Slower than expected startup time, Limited latitude of image parameter adjustment, AF assist lamp requires flash to be up, Initially confusing User setting concept, Lower than advertised continuous shooting speed, Battery life limited by low capacity Lith...
  • At first the Coolpix 8700 looks like a simple upgrade for Nikon, take the Coolpix 5700 body, the same lens and controls and drop in an eight megapixel CCD. However its clear that the 8700 has changed quite a bit under the skin, the camera starts more...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2004-04-19, review by: pcmag.com

  • Abstract:  Specs: Megapixels: 8, Maximum Resolution: 3264 x 2448 pixels, Media Format: None, Type: Enthusiast

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2004-04-02, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Abstract:  A digital camera for the advanced photographer.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2004-03-22, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Abstract:  EZ Print Link Readers have requested free-formatted versions of my reviews (without the graphical accouterments of our page design), to make printing easier. I'm accommodating this request with special copies of each review, formatted to allow the text fl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2004-01-28, review by: steves-digicams.com

  • Abstract:  The Nikon Coolpix 8700 is for serious photographers who demand the highest level of quality and control from their compact digital camera. It features an 8.0 effective megapixel CCD (3,264 x 2,448-pixels) and an 8x Optical (35-280 mm) Zoom-Nikkor lens,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2005-09-01, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Abstract:  Nikons 8Mp Coolpix 8700 combines high resolutions, long lenses and stacks of features. It is capable of delivering the same 3264x2448-pixel images as its 8Mp peers - around 25 per cent more than a 5Mp camera offers, and enough detail to make good-look...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2004-07-01, review by: Zdnet.com.au

  • Abstract:  Like nearly all the megazoom digital cameras weve reviewed, the Coolpix 8700 sports a chunky faux-SLR design. Nikon doesnt make this look work any better than anyone else does. But the camera is surprisingly compact, and it weighs 540g with battery a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2004-06-07, review by: T3.com

  • Small, tough body. Sharp 8x lens. Hi-res chip,
  • No image-stabiliser. Confusing interface. High price.
  • Small, tough body. Sharp 8x lens. Hi-res chip.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×