Testseek.com have collected 54 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus.
(82%)
54 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: AMD, INTEL CPU 8종 게임성능벤치마크 안녕하세요. 플웨즈 이은광입니다. 이번에 플웨즈에서는 AMD와 인텔CPU를 통해 그동안 벤치마크가 이루어진 게임으로 CPU의 성능을 간단하게 비교테스트를 진행했습니다. 게임에 따라 해상도마다 CPU에 주는 부하가 다른만큼 대부분 2560X1600해상도, 1920X1080해상도에서 테스트...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2013-02-11, Author: Don , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....
Abstract: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
Abstract: Not long after the launch of Bulldozer, AMD have filled their ranks with an entire gamma of CPUs based on this microarchitecture, with the prefix FX, which is a marketing trick supposed to remind us of the “good old times” when FX CPUs were the alpha a...
Sadly, its more of the same bad news for AMD or anyone with a Socket AM3+ motherboard looking for a decent CPU for around the £150 mark. The FX-8120 just isn't a good choice when it comes to the kind of applications we run on our PCs. It's regularly outpa...
The CPU presentation box is very special, much more interesting than the solution chosen by Intel; the included CPU cooler is pretty loud and we recommend acquiring a custom cooling solution right from the start. By using a high-end air CPU cooler, ...
Good performance in multithread programs, Availability, Price
Bad performance in single thread, Power consumption (especially if overclocked)
FX-8120, like the Bulldozer platform in whole, is bit of a weird product on the market. While it has mediocre performance in multithreaded programs, it falls far behind similarly priced Intel processors in singlethreaded programs. Intel i5 2500K did b...
Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
