kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 1 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-07-11, Author: hassan , review by: wccftech.com

  • You may wonder why it took us so long to review the FX-8150? We received the processor last month and had to cover the Haswell Core i7-4770K first along with Computex 2013 which had put alot of load on me. But here we finally have the Bulldozer review and...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-09, review by: techgage.com

  • Abstract:  Ok. You, the readers, were right. We screwed up. I'll be the first to admit that when we picked the components for our current cooler testing machine a few years back, we blew it.It's not that the gear is bad, per se, it just isn't best-suited for testing...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-09-24, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  To no real surprise at all, bdver1 led to the best results for this AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer processor, the only interesting facts are the improvements by which the resulting binaries were faster for the different workloads compared to the other compil...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-09-20, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  Under some workloads Ubuntu 12.10 is faster on the AMD FX-8150 system while in other cases it's noticeably slower than Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS. Stay tuned for some more articles coming out shortly that look at the performance changes in finer detail ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-23, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  As you may know, a while back, we came to some difficult realizations about the validity of our methods for testing PC gaming performance. In my article Inside the second: A new look at game benchmarking, we explained why the widely used frames-per-second...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-23, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • The new Core i7-3770K is a no-brainer if you were considering buying the Core i7-2600K; it costs the same and is faster.It is, however, very important to understand that this processor is targeted to users who will really benefit from additional proces...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-18, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  While Himeno between K8 and bdver1 yields a net performance improvement, when targeting k8-sse3/btver1/barcelona the performance was actually even better than when bdver1 was used. Lastly, with C-Ray there is a small performance improvement in moving...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-13, review by: techpowerup.com

  • Modular and versatile architecture, Great performance in multithreaded applications, Great overclocking potential
  • General performance below expectations, and rival products, High power consumption under load, compared to Intel's chips, Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
  • AMD Bulldozer is with us for months now, more than enough time has passed for the product to set into its market slot. Bulldozer and AMD did not live up to expectations, nor did they deliver a competitive desktop product which they very much need right...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 23 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×