kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 8 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-02, review by: itreviews.com

  • Eight cores and loads of clock speed at a reasonable price,
  • Performance is unimpressive, and the power draw is too high.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-27, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  We've already seen AMD's Bulldozer architecture come up short in the performance benchmarks. However, the company also claims it made important improvements to power consumption. Can FX-8150 at least score some points in the energy efficiency departmen...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-25, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Performance in applications makes effective use of multiple cores, Two Turbo modes
  • Power consumption, Performances should be higher compared with competitors' CPUs and AMD's older models
  • Ultimately, the AMD FX-8150 is a good CPU in every field apart from power consumption. AMD has finally climbed back up to the performance levels of Intel, but we were expecting more, as the next generation of Intel CPUs risks leaving AMD trailing behin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-13, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Abstract:  The dust has settled, AMD's 'Bulldozer' FX-8150 chip has been stripped bare, and we've passed judgement. Nonplussed by the apparent lethargy of the processor in our suite of benchmarks, AMD sent word that FX was particularly partial to being overclocke...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: kitguru.net

  • overclocks well, good scaling, faster than the Core i5 2500k, performs exceptionally well with modern gaming engines,
  • UK pricing is high, putting it head to head against Core i7 2600k, When Core i5 2500k is overclocked it is closely matched, and costs less, 990FXA motherboards are still expensive, Kitguru says: A high performance processor, but the launch is hampered wit
  • The AMD FX 8150 Black Edition is certainly a high performance processor, although I have to admit that for the majority of applications on test today, it failed to really get me excited. I am loathe to give the impression that I am a ‘jaded reviewer', but...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Perhaps the most hotly-anticipated launch in 2011, AMD’s FX processor line-up is finally ready for prime time. Does the company’s new Bulldozer architecture have what it takes to face Intel’s Sandy Bridge and usher in a new era of competition? How much...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • An overclockable eight-core processor, but its performance is disappointing ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: techradar.com

  • Great overclocking, Serious multi-threading chops for less than £200
  • Only slightly faster at stock than 1100T, Struggles against 2500K, And is pricier
  • We can't help but feel disappointed with the lack of performance progress the FX-8150 represents. It's not a bad chip, but we wanted more...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Mike , review by: alphr.com

  • Unable to compete on speed and price, which means one thing - Intel still rules the roost...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Modern design, elegant modular architecture, Attractive pricing, AM3socket is backwards compatible
  • Not as fast as Thuban (1100T) in lightload apps, Underload powerdraw not ideal, Arguably still behind Intel's SB as an allround chip

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 8 of 23 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×