kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Phenom X4 9850 2.5GHz Socket AM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom X4 9850 2.5GHz Socket AM2+

Testseek.com have collected 32 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom X4 9850 2.5GHz Socket AM2+ and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom X4 9850 2.5GHz Socket AM2+.
Award: Most Awarded April 2008
April 2008
 
(72%)
32 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
72 0 100 32

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-11-03, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  Dealing with current news means that we rarely have the opportunity to review old products and of course a comparison between the most recent products and those that came out several years ago can get a little problematic. But we’ve decided to push th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-24, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • The chart and the graph use geometrical mean results obtained in all tests. Weve noticed two things: firstly, Intel MKL has a positive effect not only on Phenom X4, but also on Phenom X3. To a much lesser degree, of course. But still, you get a 7% pe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-05, review by: digital-daily.com

  • Despite the not very high overclocking capability, the derogation to AMD Phenom processors, in our view, are unlikely to be justified. Although currently you wont be able setting new records with these processors, they may prove to be highly attractiv...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-06-26, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Just 91 points. AMD Phenom X4 9850 performs on a par with Intel Core 2 Duo E6600. These words sound like a hammer nailing down a coffin lid: the top quad-core processor from AMD, launched in 2008, demonstrates average performance on the level with a d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-06-05, review by: pcmag.com

  • TLB bug fixed; runs reasonably cool. Moderate overclockability.
  • Performance is anemic relative to Intel.
  • Its low cost offsets performance issues, but performance issues still plague the latest Phenom. The lack of a core multiplier is a big plus for system tweakers....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-01, review by: arstechnica.com

  • Re-establishes AMD as a competitor in the $150+ market, Strong multi-threaded performance in certain tests compared to dual-core alternatives.
  • When I said "certain" tests, I meant it—triple-core products are not a guaranteed win over Intels Core 2 Duo, Pricing on certain models make them a bad deal.
  • Its hard to put a definitive label on AMDs triple-core Toliman. The Phenom X3 series re-establishes AMDs presence in the $150-$200 price point, and the companys decision to fight Intels dual cores with three of its own is not without merit. Althou...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-30, review by: madshrimps.be

  • Abstract:  Win MSI VGA, Motherboard, Laptop in this Overclocking Contest! The history of the alternative choice:Advanced Micro Devices, or AMD as we know, has been around for quite some time now. In the early personal computer era, Intel had more than one compet...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-04-16, review by: techwarelabs.com

  • The AMD Phenom X4 9850 Quad Core CPU looks like it is well on its way in the to being an excellent choice for gamers and computer enthusiasts due to being approximately half the price of a comparable Intel CPU and being the quickest AMD Phenom commerc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-11, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Without considering overclocking, AMD has improved the Phenom B3s and made quite a positive impact. The improved memory performance and corrected silicon is absolutely a step in the right direction, and what the Phenoms should have been launched as six...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-09, review by: extremetech.com

  • High clock speed; 6MB L2 cache; fast in games.
  • Pricey compared to the Q9300.
  • Intels Wolfdale CPU is highly overclockable, but the performance advantage over the Q9300 is surprisingly small....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×