kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz Socket AM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz Socket AM2+

Testseek.com have collected 34 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz Socket AM2+ and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz Socket AM2+.
Award: Recommended May 2008
May 2008
 
(78%)
34 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
78 0 100 34

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-12-17, review by: rbmods.com

  • Cheap, Decent performance, Quad core
  • Slower than Intel
  • Now there is a performance difference on the processors that I have used in the test. The old QX6700 cost around 800$USD new while the X4 9850 can be found for as low as 170$ USD so in the end there is quite a big of price difference. The i7 processors...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-07-13, review by: futurelooks.com

  • I really have to hand it to AMD for listening to the community, stepping up to the plate, and making the changes required to make their latest product perform the way its expected to. Like I said in my review of the Phenom 9600 Black Edition, this is...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2008-06-23, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  June 23, 2008 While the Phenom initially received a rather lukewarm reception, new B3 stepping combined with a tri-core versions and more aggressive pricing is supposed to give it a second wind. How do they fare in tests?What has changedThe benefits o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-28, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  Users familiar with AMD Black Edition brand already know what kind of CPU we got in our test lab and for those unfamiliar with BE AMD CPUs we are going to explain it. Back in the past AMD had prestigious FX series of CPUs which were very expensive but ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-19, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Socket AM2+; Clock speed: 2.5GHz; HyperTransport Link: 4GHz (full duplex); 65nm process; Cache: 2MB shared L3, 2MB L2 (512KB per core), 512KB L1 (128KB per core); Voltage: 1.2V/1.3V (min/max); 125W max TDP AMD has been busily revising its line of quad-...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-14, review by: techspot.com

  • So what is new from last time? Not a whole lot really. Clock for clock nothing has changed with the B3 stepping in terms of performance, as the Phenom X4 9850 is no faster or slower than the 9900 engineering sample when both CPUs are clocked at 2.5GHz...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-14, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Best Phenom overclocking potential; no TLB bug; good upgrade for AM2 Athlon X2 systems
  • umption than Intel quad cores; more expensive and slightly lower performance than Intel quad cores
  • If you must buy an AMD processor, this is the best out there, but Intel’s CPUs still hold most of the aces

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-11, Author: Edward , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  It's fair to say the first batch of AMDs Phenom CPUs were a bit underwhelming. Though they represented decent value for money, due to AMDs cut-throat pricing, and brought some welcome competition to Intel on the quad-core front, the simple fact of the mat...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-10, review by: guru3d.com

  • The B3 revision of Phenom finally leaves the TBL bug behind it, performance was definitely faster in many segments, and the Phenom 9850 as tested today is pretty much on par with the Intel Q6600 at many fronts, though not pre-dominantly. Fact remains ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-09, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  April 9, 2008 At the launch of the Phenom last November, we unfortunately noted that its performances were not too competitive with those of the Q6600 (the equivalent of 86% the latter). However, shortly thereafter, another more serious problem appear...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×