kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 73 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775.
 
(79%)
73 Reviews
Users
(94%)
351 Reviews
79 0 100 73

 

Reviews

page 1 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-01-22, review by: MVKtech.net

  • Excellent Performance, Quad Core Technology, MultiThreading Performance, Unlocked Multiplier, Outstanding Functionality, Amazing Overclocking Capability, Future Proof Technology, Power
  • Quite Expensive
  • Impressed? Just an honest question... We at least have to admit that Intel and their first quad core processor did leave quite an impression. The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 quad core did show that multi-processing is changing from using multiple processors ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-01-22, review by: i4u.com

  • Abstract:  Today we are going to have a look at the top of the line CPU offering from Intel, the QX6700 Core 2 Quad Extreme Edition. This CPU is the fastest desktop CPU Intel or AMD has built to date and lives up to the Extreme Edition Moniker very well. Not only...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2007-01-01, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  QX6700 $999 Intel www.intel.com CPU Rating: 4 Specs: 2.66GHz; 1,066MHz FSB; 0.65-micron manufacturing process; 8MB L2 cache (4MB x2, dynamically allocated) Intel’s brand-new, quad-core CPU comes hot on the heels of the Core 2 Extreme X6800, which bo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-19, review by: techpowerup.com

  • First commercially available quadcore CPU, Performance, Overclockability
  • Price, Heat output, Stock HSF
  • The QX6700 from Intel is a CPU like no other, it is the first quad core CPU that you can buy at almost any computer store. I must say that Intel rightly deserves to be called performance king.First, I would like to comment on Intels Extreme CPUs in ge...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-07, review by: Cdrinfo.com

  • The first Intel Core 2 Quad processors, codenamed Kentsfield are built on a 65 nm process and intended to enhance the way we work with our desktop and server systems. Intel claims that the Core2Quad is up to 80% faster than the Core2Duo XE6800 which ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-12-01, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Core 2 Extreme QX6700 $999 Intel www.intel.com First Look Preview Specs: 2.66GHz clock speed; 1,066MHz FSB; 65nm manufacturing process, 8MB L2 cache (2x 4MB, dynamically allocated) After losing some ground to a tenacious chipmaker that produced a strin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-21, review by: Bcchardware.com

  • Unless you are going for pure bragging rights a quad core processor really is ahead of its time. While there are a few real world applications that take advantage of this processors multi-threaded power, most do not. In theoretical tests, the quad ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(20%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-07, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  November 7, 2006 In April 2005, Intel was the first to release a dual core processor just before AMD. These processors became more and more popular since the release of the Core 2 Duo and decreases on AMD´s price list. Now the number of cores increase...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-04, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Our review of Core 2 Extreme QX6700, the first Intel quad-core CPU running at 2.66 GHz and compatible with socket 775 platform. Does quad-core CPUs really improve PC performance? Check it out.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-03, Author: Sean , review by: planetx64.com

  • Abstract:  So are four cores better than two? The answer is both a resounding yes and a disappointing no.For gaming, four cores is not going to show much of an improvement over two or even one until game developers begin coding games to take advantage of them. N...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×