kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 101 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155.
Award: Most Awarded April 2011
April 2011
 
(81%)
101 Reviews
Users
(93%)
779 Reviews
81 0 100 101

 

Reviews

page 1 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-03-19, Author: SunUP , review by: playwares.com

  • Abstract:  AMD vs INTEL 내장그래픽 게임성능 테스트 안녕하세요. 플웨즈 막내 부운영자 김해오름[SunUP] 입니다. 이번 리뷰는.. AMD APU A6-3670K, A8-3870K, A8-3870K 3.5G O.C(링크) 블랙 에디션 제품과 인텔 샌디브릿지 G620, I3-2100 의 내장그래픽 성능 테스트와 더불어 G620 + NVIDIA GT430 조합도 테스트 해봤습...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-02-11, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  At the end of January I published my initial Core i3 7100 Linux benchmarks while for those still on older Sandy Bridge hardware and thinking of upgrading to a Core i3 Kabylake, here are some interesting comparative benchmarks. For these weekend tests are...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-25, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Sandy Bridge microarchitecture is amazingly diverse. We have already admired the high performance of processors based on it many time, and today we saw clearly that it is also a perfect fit for products to be used in quiet, compact and energy-efficien...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-06, review by: lanoc.org

  • All Pages Page 1 of 15Intel started 2011 off with the official introduction to their highly anticipated Sandy Bridge processors. We had the chance to take a look at their mid-range i5-2500k and we loved it. The i5-2500k isn’t perfect for everyone, tha...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-01, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Despite the lack of Turbo Boost, the i3-2100 was able to hold its own in many of our benchmarks, giving CPUs such as the LGA1366 Core i7-950 and quad-core Core i5-2400 something to think about. Most inspiring of all was its speed in games and image edi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(72%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-30, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Following up the launch of CPUs with an integrated video controller for laptops two weeks ago, codenamed “Llano,” AMD is finally launching their much anticipated CPU series for desktops with an integrated video controller. Let’s check the performance o...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-23, review by: silentpcreview.com

  • Abstract:  Intel Core i3-2100T and Core i5-2400S processors have a rated speed of just 2.5 GHz, but the i5-2400S has some crazy Turbo Boost speeds, and they both have TDPs 30W lower than their standard counterparts.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×