kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Notebooks » Asus UX534FA Zenbook



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Asus UX534FA Zenbook

Testseek.com have collected 4 expert reviews of the Asus UX534FA Zenbook and the average rating is 75%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Asus UX534FA Zenbook.
 
(75%)
4 Reviews
Users
(91%)
43 Reviews
75 0 100 4

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-11-08, Author: Mark , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Excellent build quality, Enjoyable keyboard, Solid CPU performance, Surprisingly good GPU
  • Battery is too small, Disappointing screen, No Thunderbolt 3
  • No. The ZenBook 15's standout feature, its small chassis, doesn't stand out enough against some stiff competition, and the ScreenPad 2.0 feels like a gimmick and not a must-have feature.Editors' RecommendationsThe best 4K laptops The best 13-inch laptops...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2019-12-16, Author: Phiphob , review by: extremepc.in.th

  • ASUS ZenBook 15 (UX534) เป็นอีกหนึ่งโน๊ตบุ๊คที่น่าใช้งานมากๆประจำปลายปีนี้ ได้พัฒนาเรื่อง ScreenPad ให้ดีขึ้น สามารถรองรับการทำงานได้หลากหลายขึ้นกว่าเดิม สามารถใช้งานเป็นเครื่องที่สองได้เลย หน้าจอทั้งจอหลักและ ScreenPad แสดงผลได้สวยงาม ประสิทธิภาพทั้ง CPU...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-12-23, review by: notebookcheck.biz

  • performances de jeu, vu la taille et le poids, ScreenPad 2.0, performances sur batterie, compact, nomade, rigide, autonomie
  • chauffe supérieure aux autres portables Core U, cartes dépassent de près de la moitié, flèches et pavé numérique réduits, pas de Thunderbolt 3 ni de lecteur d'empreintes digitales, une unique solution de stockage M.2 2280, ne peut se charger via USB C,
  • En test: l'Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77. Modèle de test fourni par Xotic PC.Les ZenBook 15 UX533 et UX534 proposent quelque chose que la plupart des autres ultrabooks de 15,6 pouces n'ont pas : un processeur Intel faible consommation couplé à une carte g...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2020-09-26, Author: Allen , review by: notebookcheck.info

  • O ScreenPad 2.0 é mais fluente e menos granulado que o ScreenPad 1.0, O singular ScreenPad é útil para multitarefas, Proporção tela-corpo alta; design compacto, Bom desempenho da CPU, Chassi e tampa rígidos, Câmera IV, Sem PWM
  • Leve curva de aprendizado para usar o ScreenPad com eficiência, GeForce MX250 de 10 W mais lenta, em vez de 25 W, O USB-C não suporta DisplayPort, O ScreenPad ainda é muito granulado, Não é possível recarregar o portátil via USB-C, RAM ou WLAN não atualiz

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×