kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Wearables » Polar Vantage M



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Polar Vantage M

Testseek.com have collected 23 expert reviews of the Polar Vantage M and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Polar Vantage M.
Award: Highest Rated May 2019
May 2019
 
(84%)
23 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 23

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-04-08, review by: zdnet.com

  • Abstract:  It's been 10 years since Samsung launched the first Galaxy S device and this year's model continues building upon the Galaxy Foundation with innovative tech, enhanced intelligence, and an overall solid competitor to the iPhone XS Max.For more see: Galaxy...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-02-01, Author: DC , review by: dcrainmaker.com

  • In general, I think the Polar Vantage series will continue to be a bit under-featured and under-accuracy compared to most of their endurance sports competitors. However, the Vantage M is in a better spot than the Vantage V from a product to price feature...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-09-02, Author: Chris , review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Lots of sport support, Great Polar Flow environment, Training programmes, Comfortable
  • Heart rate sensor a bit hit and miss, No music support, No payments
  • The Polar Vantage M is the second-tier of Polar's flagship fitness tracker, slotting in below the Vantage V and losing some hardware and features in the process. For the majority of users, the Vantage M will do everything that you want, with the Vantage V...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2019-07-15, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Much better looking than the M430, Solid performer, Good battery life
  • No notifications (yet), Hidden thick bezel, Not the brightest colour screen
  • The Polar M430 was a triumph, but one that made you pick your brains over whether to wear it when you weren't training. The Vantage M is positively stunning by comparison, and packs in everything I loved from its predecessor into a far more aesthetically...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2019-02-08, Author: Kieran , review by: techradar.com

  • Lightweight, More stylish design, Big battery life
  • No music, Running power needs additional sensor, Can be slow to sync
  • It's more expensive than the older M430, but the Vantage M is a powerful multi-sports training tool that packs in plenty of additional features that make it worth the investment. With a much-finessed design, more accurate wrist-based heart rate and bucket...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-12-18, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Much better looking than the M430, Solid performer, Good battery life
  • No notifications (yet), Hidden thick bezel, Not the brightest colour screen
  • The Polar M430 was a great, but ugly-looking wearable. The Vantage M fixes its looks but keeps most of the functionality...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-12-18, Author: Michael , review by: wareable.com

  • Comfortable design, Easy to use, Great battery life, Useful training insights,
  • Running power requires additional sensor, Some syncing issues, Some missing features from Vantage V, Lacks smartwatch features,
  • The Polar Vantage M might cost less than the Vantage V, but that doesn't mean you get a vastly more inferior sports watch. The design changes are not drastic enough to dramatically alter the experience of wearing the M 24/7. In fact some ways it's nicer t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-12-16, review by: gadgetexplained.com

  • Abstract:  While ECG chest straps are the go-to fitness device for monitoring heart rate, wrist tracking technology has finally bridged the gap between wrist-based optical heart rate watches and chest strap ECG heart rate monitors! The Polar Vantage M pushes the e...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-09-18, Author: Kieran , review by: techradar.com

  • Lightweight, More stylish design
  • No music, Less grippy buttons than the V
  • Though it's more expensive than the M430, first impressions suggest the Polar Vantage M is a powerful multisport training tool that might be worth the extra investment. It's a much better looker and with better wrist heart rate and loads more training ins...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2019-08-09, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Un peu plus de 4 jours d'autonomie, Un cardiofréquencemètre précis, Des applications Polar Flow et Polar Beat très complètes
  • Une ergonomie moyenne, Une interface difficile, Pas d'altimètre barométrique
  • La Vantage M se présente comme une montre de sport de qualité. Ses relevés de fréquence cardiaque sont pertinents, son autonomie est exemplaire, et les applications Polar qui en permettent la gestion sont excellentes. En revanche, quand la montre se mue e...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×