kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SGH-U800 Soul



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SGH-U800 Soul

Testseek.com have collected 28 expert reviews of the Samsung SGH-U800 Soul and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SGH-U800 Soul.
Award: Highest Rated September 2008
September 2008
 
(76%)
28 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 28

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-01-15, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • A stylish handset with decent entertainment and internet features....
  • A rather basic music player and slightly clunky messaging menu.Look and Feel...
  • A handsome slimline phone, but it could do with a more streamlined user interface. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-31, Author: Sandra , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Samsung seems to be a bit of an unstoppable force at the moment, with new handsets popping up with great frequency. Only a couple of weeks ago we had the 8-megapixel flagship model the i8510 , which reached the rare status of a TrustedReviews Recommended ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-08-04, review by: phonearena.com

  • Attractive quality metal body, Userfriendly buttons, Excellent sound quality when listening to music, Good camera picture quality
  • Weak battery, Lag in the menus, An outdated web browser, Limited video playback capabilities
  • Overall, we are nicely surprised from Soulb, which definitely deserves its place in Samsung’s fashion series. It’s key features are the attractive design, the comfortable use, the excellent musical qualities and the decent camera. All the other element...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-21, review by: smape.com

  • Samsung U800 Soul B seems to us a perfectly balanced solution, a strong player in the segment of slim fashion phones. A casing made entirely from high-quality stainless steel covered with a lacquer coating meant to repulse the grease is the strongest ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-07-06, review by: mobile-review.com US

  • Abstract:  The reception quality put up by the U800 is in line with other Samsung-branded devices. The ringtone volume is quite decent, as it can be heard in various environments. The silent alert is average strength-wise, no significant improvements have been m...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-12-19, Author: Paul , review by: tweaktown.com

  • Yes, the device is slow. Yes, the device is practically unusable in the sunlight and yes, the camera and MP3 functions are not good enough to replace any main devices you already own.However, this is a true phone; it handles calls well and texts wel...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(89%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-23, review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Abstract:  the U800 does the job as a mid-range phone, and looks good doing it. Samsung U800 Soul B ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-27, review by: tracyandmatt.co.uk

  • The Samsung U800 Soul is a wonderful low to mid market phone. Although not rich in many of todays must have features it does not claim to be anything other than it actually is.Without sounding remotely sexist this phone was designed with women in mind...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-25, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Thin and stylish it may be, but the Samsung U800 isn’t a phone that tries to dazzle with the very latest gadgetry. Instead, it’s a reliable performer that has a decent spread of 3G mid-tier functionality and multimedia action on board. Underst...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-09-25, review by: techradar.com

  • Stylish design, Slimline metal casing, HSDPA, 1GB internal memory, Great music player, Earphones supplied with 3.5mm headphone adapter, 3-megapixel camera, Good battery life, FM radio
  • Camera lacks autofocus and has ordinary LED flash, Average quality earphones supplied, Display could be larger, Poor quality video capture

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×