Testseek.com have collected 185 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A320 Galaxy A3 2017 and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A320 Galaxy A3 2017.
February 2017
(78%)
185 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(84%)
417 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
780100185
Reviews
page 1 of 19
Order by:
Score
Published: 2018-04-02, Author: Bình , review by: topnewreview.com
We wish it ran a more recent version of Android, but otherwise this is a decent phone
Published: 2017-06-13, Author: Alex , review by: recombu.com
Smooth performance, Well designed UX, Premium design, Great battery life
Out-performed by similarly priced phones, Low internal storage, Fingerprint magnet, Outdated OS
Despite its standing in the company's current product lineup, for the most part, Samsung hasn't skimped on quality with this mid-ranger. Its design and build quality are unquestionably excellent with useful inclusions like water resistance, USB-C and a fi...
Published: 2017-04-04, Author: Manuel , review by: notebookcheck.net
high-quality workmanship, water and dustproof (IP68), USB Type-C port with USB-OTG, LTE, NFC, 802.11 ac Wi-Fi, very bright well-adjusted AMOLED display, decent camera, decent performance, stays cool, good speaker, very good battery life
smooth and slick back side, only LTE Cat. 4, no Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL), no dual SIM, no optical image stabilization, PWM-flicker
Stylish design with metal frame and glass back, inspired by Galaxy S7, Water resistance (IP68), 4.7-inch Super AMOLED display with Always on feature, color modes and protections, Surprisingly good battery durability + power saving modes, Android 6.0 Marsh
The body is a fingerprint magnet, Less than 10GB free space
Nowadays, finding an Android smartphone with a screen smaller than 5 inches is definitely not an easy task, especially if you insist on good technical specifications. The rich Samsung portfolio, however, includes such feature in Galaxy A3 (2017). It combi...
Amazing design: beatiful glassmetal look, thin and comfortable, ergonomic, Water resistance is a great extra, Excellent battery life, Very good image quality in daylight, Excellent onscreen keyboard, great typing experience, Support expandable storage via
A bit more expensive than other phones its class, Only 16GB of onboard storage, Lack of video stabilization results in very shaky videos, Runs on a 1yearold Android version (6.0 Marshmallow)
The Galaxy A3 (2017) is such an exciting phone: it brings a level of sophistication in design and interface that we have not yet seen on affordable phones. Neither have we seen a phone with water resistance.Samsung knows this and this year's Galaxy A3 is...
Abstract: It’s simple enough – today’s smartphones are too large for some. While bezels on smartphones have shrunk over the past few years (meaning bigger screens), it hasn’t stopped the general growth of smartphone dimensions.Compact phones weigh less, are easy to...
Published: 2018-08-02, Author: David , review by: uk.hardware.info
We note that there are certainly significant differences between individual devices and also between routers and relevant chipsets on the 5 GHz frequencies. At both frequencies and in combination with both the R7800 and the R8000, the differences between...
Abstract: We're defining a mid-range range phone as one that costs between £200 (the higher limit of our budget phones chart ) and £400. This price criteria means that our list includes new phones that fit the price bracket, but also flagships from the past year o...
If you're looking for a smaller version of the Galaxy A range, this should suit you but there are a few areas which feature slightly disappointing spec.The screen isn't as high resolution as we would have hoped, and the limited storage space is sure to ca...
