kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D40X



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D40X

Testseek.com have collected 76 expert reviews of the Nikon D40X and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D40X.
Award: Good Buy January 2008
January 2008
 
(84%)
76 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 76

 

Reviews

page 3 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-06-01, review by: tipa.com

  • Abstract:  Awarded by TIPA Association.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-05-19, review by: letsgodigital.org

  • Abstract:  With the Nikon D40x, Nikon surprises us in many ways. First of all by placing an almost identical model right next to the D40. The Nikon D40x only slightly deviates from the Nikon D40 on some points, and what strikes us the most is that the amount of p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-07, Author: Philip , review by: cnet.com

  • Comfortable, compact body design; very low noise at higher ISOs; highly customizable menus; 10.2-megapixel CCD sensor
  • Slow kit lenses; RAW editing software costs extra; controls can be awkward; occasionally slow to focus; no automatic sensor cleaning; RAW-plus-JPEG mode limited to basic instead of fine JPEG compression
  • The Nikon D40x makes a very nice first dSLR, though experienced SLR shooters looking for a Nikon should spend the extra cash for the D80.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-01, review by: cameralabs.com

  • Small, light and comfortable, Very easy to use with helpful menus, Consumer-friendly photos out of the camera, Nikons legendary metering is rarely fooled.
  • Features weaker than 10 Mpixel rivals, No auto-focus with certain, older lenses, Some settings require too many button presses, Basic 3-point AF and no DOF preview.
  • The Nikon D40x is certainly an interesting proposition. Nikon took the D40 which is a very successful beginners DSLR and equipped it with a sensor to compete against the Canon 400D / XTi. So far so good, but the D40x also inherits several weaker aspec...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(79%)
 
  Published: 2007-04-27, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Abstract:  The D40x is not a replacement for the D40’ and ‘it’s the differences that make the difference’ were the two key points at the low-key launch of Nikon’s latest DSLR – the D40x. So often were these phrases repeated that i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-04-18, Author: Cliff , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  To say that Nikon and Canon are in competition with one another is something of an understatement. They are the Manchester United and Arsenal, the Schumacher and Alonso, the Tyson and Holyfield of the camera world. They hold the number one and two positio...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2007-03-06, review by: dpreview.com

  • Resolution and sharpness on par with the best of the current ten megapixel bunch, A demonstrable resolution gain at lower sensitivities, less obvious at ISO 800 and 1600, Surprisingly good build quality, tight shut lines, Very compact and lightweight (esp...
  • No lens motor in body means non-AF-S/AF-I lenses are manual focus only, Disappointingly RAW+JPEG setting only records Basic quality JPEGs, No status LCD panel on top of camera (we hate to see these go), No exposure or white balance bracketing, No hard but...
  • No one was more surprised that me when Nikon passed through the press releases for the D40X. Just under four months since the arrival of the six megapixel D40 and Nikon were about to reveal a ten megapixel version of the same (save for a base ISO 100 ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: creationview.com


 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-02-19, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Abstract:  Just six months ago, we looked at the D40 (April 2007, page52) and it’s already old news. The D40x is the new kid on the block and makes a huge leap from 6 to 10 megapixels. This, and the pricing, put it in direct competition with Canon’s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2007-06-27, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Great picture quality, superbly fast, nice design
  • Some minor chromatic aberration issues The Final Word The best entry level SLR weve used, the D40x narrowly edges out offerings by Canon and Sony. It combines extremely speedy operation, great quality images and an excellent design to make a wonderful...
  • The best entry level SLR weve used, the D40x narrowly edges out offerings by Canon and Sony. It combines extremely speedy operation, great quality images and an excellent design to make a wonderful, all purpose camera.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
    page 3 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×