kr.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D40X



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D40X

Testseek.com have collected 76 expert reviews of the Nikon D40X and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D40X.
Award: Good Buy January 2008
January 2008
 
(84%)
76 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 76

 

Reviews

page 5 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-07-11, Author: Gavin , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Specification boosting re-imagining of the D40 introduces 10-megapixel capture and 3fps shooting speed
  • Upgraded features not particularly significant to existing users, though they do bring the product into sync with the line-ups of its rivals Min specs: OS X v10.3.9, 10.4x
  • Despite Nikon’s “nobody could better the D40 so we decided to do it ourselves” flippancy, owners of the D40 shouldn’t feel pressure to update, the ‘x’ version’s additions have generally been made to bring the came...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2007-06-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Resolution: 10 megapixels; Optical zoom: 3x; Memory card type: SD Card; Optical viewfinder: Yes; Screen size: 2.5in; Quoted battery life: 520 shots; Size: 126 x 64 x 94mm; Weight: 530g Nikon knows a thing or two about making cameras, having been in t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-21, review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Abstract:  No more than five months after we reviewed Nikon’s entry-level six-megapixel D40, the company has released an upgraded version, the D40x. Now carrying a 10mp resolution APS-C size sensor as well as a competitive price ticket, the new Nikon is clearl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-18, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Comfortable, compact body design; very low noise at higher ISOs; highly customisable menus; 10.2-megapixel CCD sensor
  • Slow kit lenses; RAW editing software costs extra; controls can be awkward; occasionally slow to focus; no automatic sensor cleaning; RAW-plus-JPEG mode limited to basic instead of fine JPEG compression
  • The Nikon D40x makes a very nice first dSLR, though experienced SLR shooters looking for a Nikon should spend the extra cash for the D80 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(77%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-15, review by: Photoradar.com

  • Examine the D40x and the only obvious difference between it and the D40 is the increased sensor resolution. The camera's design, controls and functions appear to be identical to Nikon's entry-level model in every other respect.There's a substantial pri...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-08, review by: techradar.com

  • Excellent JPEG quality
  • Too expensive, Convoluted controls
  • The Nikon D40x is neither an upgrade for the 6-megapixel D40 model, nor a replacement for the D80. Instead, it sits slightly uncomfortably between the two models, further expanding Nikons range of budget and enthusiast SLRs. Essentially its a D80 sen...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-05-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  As far as appearances are concerned, the new Nikon D40x looks very similiar to the five-month-old 6 megapixel D40, apart from the badge to the right of the lens throat. Its also bundled with the same excellent kit lens, the Nikon-made AF-S DX 18-55mm ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-04-18, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Image quality, Good noise control, Small size
  • No depth of field indication, No gridlines in the viewfinder, Limited compatibility with the Nikkor lens line

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-04-10, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Handling, design, 2.5-inch colour LCD, USB2 (Hi-Speed) connectivity, image quality
  • Top plate data LCD missing, no lens motor in body (non-AF-S/AF-I lenses manual focus only), no depth of field preview, no exposure, or white balance bracketing, more noise
  • We arent convinced the extra 4 million pixels are worth another 100-quid

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-07, review by: firstpost.com

  • Abstract:  Out of the box, the body of the D40X felt comparatively light at 522g. Of course, considering that the body is missing quite a few essentials like an autofocus mechanism, it had better be light! The cameras physical dimensions and appearance is exactl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×